4 Ways Quacks Manipulate Their Audiences

Is Jordan Peterson a quack? Is he a charlatan, an honest educator, or something in between? In talking about experimental psychology, he does well, but his teachings on Carl Jung and Jungian archetypes are suspect. Whether or not you espouse faulty ideologies or pseudoscience, sometimes the WAY you communicate can be the most deceptive.

I'd love to hear Jordan Peterson talk about quacks manipulating audiences so I could get a feel for how purposeful his methods are. Reading 12 Rules for Life and watching his lectures inspired me to make this video but it applies to TONS of speakers other than Peterson.

My new discord server: Discord: discord
Video about JP an psilopsybin: Jordan Peterson Misrepresents Science

This video contains 100% therapeutic grade skepticism.*

-----------------------------------------SUPPORT-----------------------------------------

Patreon: Patreon: GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/GMSkeptic

------------------------------------------FOLLOW------------------------------------------

Twitter: Twitter: gm_skeptic
Facebook: Facebook: GMSkeptic
Discord: Discord: discord

Source on Jungian psych in modern psychology: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...



*This statement has not been evaluated by the FDA

• #education
• #atheism
• #atheist
• #agnostic
• #skeptic
• #skepticism
• #genetically_modified_skeptic
• #jordan_peterson
• #jordan_b_peterson
• #is_jordan_peterson_a_quack
• #is_jordan_peterson_a_charlatan
• #quack
• #charlatan
• #how_quacks_imitate_science
• #jordan
• #peterson
• #12_rules_for_life
• #debunked
• #cargo_cult_science
• #joe_rogan
• #matt_dillahunty
• #carl_jung
• #jung
• #jungian_archetypes
• #archetypes
• #dna
• #pseudoscience
• #experimental_psychology
• #analytical_psychology