Imam Ja’far Al-Sadiq (In the eyes of Ahlul Sunnah) | Sheikh Said Al Kamali الشيخ سعيد الكملي
34.3 هزار بار بازدید -
17 ساعت پیش
-
His status in terms of
His status in terms of knowledge, virtue and adherence to the Sunnah, and his disavowal of the Raafidis and other extremists, and the seriousness of their fabrications against him:
Abu Ahmad ibn ‘Adiyy said: He narrated many hadiths from his father, from Jaabir and from his forefathers. The leading scholars narrated from him. And he was one of the trustworthy people, as Ibn Ma‘een said.
It was narrated that ‘Amr ibn Abi’l-Miqdaam said: When I looked at Ja‘far ibn Muhammad, I realised that he was descended from Prophets. I saw him standing at the Jamrah, saying: Ask me, ask me.
‘Ali ibn al-Ja‘d narrated that Zuhayr ibn Mu‘aawiyah said: My father said to Ja‘far ibn Muhammad: I have a neighbour who claims that you disavowed Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. Ja‘far said: May Allah disavow your neighbour. By Allah, I hope that Allah will benefit me through my ties of blood with Abu Bakr, for I fell ill one time and I left my will with my maternal uncle ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn al-Qaasim (which means that he was very close to him).
Ibn ‘Uyaynah said: They narrated to me from Ja‘far ibn Muhammad – although I did not hear it (directly) from him – that he said: At the time of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), the family of Abu Bakr were called the family of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).
Muhammad ibn Fudayl said, narrating from Saalim ibn Abi Hafsah, that he said: I asked Abu Ja‘far and his son Ja‘far about Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. He said: O Saalim, regard them as allies and disavow anyone who regards them as enemies, for they are both imams of guidance.
Then Ja‘far said: O Saalim, would a man revile his grandfather? Abu Bakr is my grandfather, and I will not attain the intercession of Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) on the Day of Resurrection if I do not regard them both (Abu Bakr and ‘Umar) as allies and disavow those who regard them as enemies.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
As for telling lies about Ja‘far and what they narrate from him of what he (allegedly) said in private (impugning Abu Bakr and ‘Umar), it is among the gravest of lies, to the extent that it is said that no one was lied about as Ja‘far (may Allah be pleased with him) was lied about.
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa, 4/78.
He also said:
The Raafidis are the most ignorant of sects, the most mendacious and the furthest removed from knowledge of religious texts and reason. They regard taqiyyah (dissimulation) as one of the fundamental principles of their religion, and they tell many lies about Ahl al-Bayt, the extent of which no one knows except Allah. They even narrate from Ja‘far as-Saadiq that he said: “Taqiyyah is my religion and the religion of my forefathers”!
Taqiyyah is the symbol of hypocrisy, because in reality it means that they say something that is not in their hearts, and this is the very essence of hypocrisy. Therefore because this is one of the fundamental principles of their religion, whatever they transmit from ‘Ali or anyone else of Ahl al-Bayt that is in harmony with the teachings of Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, they describe it as having been said by way of taqiyyah. Thus they opened wide the doors of hypocrisy to the baatini Qaraamitah [an extreme esoteric sect].
End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (13/263).
He also said:
The problem is with those who lied about Ja‘far, not with Ja‘far himself… to the extent that everyone who wanted to make his lies acceptable to people attributed them to Ja‘far.
End quote from Minhaaj as-Sunnah (4/54).
Imam Ja‘far as-Saadiq’s disavowal of the Raafidis and their ilk is too well known to need a list of all the reports, and their fabrications against him are too many to be counted.
A quick glance at the names of his shaykhs, such as ‘Ata’ ibn Abi Rabaah, az-Zuhri, ‘Urwah ibn az-Zubayr, al-Qaasim ibn Muhammad and others, and a quick glance at the names of his students who narrated from him, such as Abu Haneefah, Sufyaan ath-Thawri, Ibn ‘Uyaynah, and Maalik, and the high esteem in which they held him and the pride they felt in being his students, will expose the lies of the baatinis (esoteric sects) concerning him. How come his shaykhs from whom he acquired knowledge and his students who learned from him, were the prominent figures among Ahl as-Sunnah in his era, then he became the imam of their enemies among the Raafidis and their ilk?
This is not the case of Ahl as-Sunnah vis-à-vis the Raafidis concerning as-Saadiq only; rather it is also the case with regard to his son and his forefathers.
Don't forget to comment, like and subscribe. Turn notifications on to make sure you don't miss our latest content.
If you like what we do, you can support us financially via our Gofundme campaign:
www.gofundme.com/f/support-quotthe-sunni-defensequ…
Our website: www.twelvershia.net/
17 ساعت پیش
در تاریخ 1403/07/07 منتشر شده
است.
34,329
بـار بازدید شده