How to Open an Ampule and Withdraw Medication
12.5 هزار بار بازدید -
7 سال پیش
-
How to Open an Ampule
How to Open an Ampule and Withdraw Medication
ampules are not commonly used nowadays but if you come across one you need to be prepared in how to safely open and withdraw from one. its been since nursing school that all of a sudden we started carrying ampules, I was surprised but always remembered the technique and using a filter needle.
The ASHP 2008 guidelines involve the above USP 797 standard and the use of a 5-µm filter needle or straw when drawing medication from a glass ampule. The INS (2011) Standard 28.6 states: “a blunted filter needle or filter straw shall be used when drawing medication from glass ampules”
AUGUST 98 - VOLUME 18 - NUMBER 4
FILTER NEEDLES AND GLASS AMPULES
Q. Are special filter needles required when drawing up medication from a glass ampule? Are there hidden risks to patients, ie, sharp glass particles, if a filter needle is not used?
A. Fred L Meister, PharmD, replies:
Bacterial contamination has always been the major concern associated with the intravenous administration of medications and is a well-known cause of morbidity and mortality. Additional risk factors, however, have been identified and must also be considered.
The potential risks associated with administration of medications supplied in glass ampules is much greater than realized by most practitioners. Opening a glass ampule produces a shower of glass particles, many of which enter the ampule and contaminate the contents. Some of the particles have been shown to carry bacteria, though the significance of this has not been determined.
The number of glass particles found in opened ampules varies, but most reports indicate approximately 100 particles, ranging in size from 10 to 1,000 �m, per 10-mL ampule. The particle count increases as the size of the ampule increases (ie, a 20-mL ampule will contain more glass particles than a 10-mL ampule). When the content of a 10-mL ampule is aspirated through an 18-gauge, 1.5-inch needle, the particle count is reduced by approximately one third (ie, approximately 65 particles remain in the aspirate), and the maximum particle size is reduced to less than 400 �m.
The potential risks associated with intravenous administration of glass particles are based on animal studies, though similar risks would apply equally to humans. It has been shown that glass particles cause inflammatory reactions (eg, phlebitis) and granuloma formation in pulmonary, hepatic, splenic, renal, and intestinal tissue. This represents a significant risk of an adverse patient outcome.
The effective removal of glass particles from an opened ampule can be accomplished by aspirating through a 19-gauge, 5-�m filter needle. Using this method decreases the average total number of particles in the aspirate to approximately �1, and the particle size to less than 200 �m. Using a 0.22-�m in-line filter offers little or no additional benefit, and is more costly and labor intensive--once the ampule content is aspirated into a syringe, the filter needle must be replaced with a standard needle prior to transferring or administering the medication.
Based on the available information, a filter needle is recommended when aspirating a medication from a glass ampule.
References
Turco S, Davis NM. Glass particles in intravenous injections. N Engl J Med. 1972;287:1204-1205.
Carbone-Traber KB, Shanks CA. Glass particle contamination in single-dose ampules. Anesth Analg. 1986;65:1361-1363.
Waller DG, George CF. Ampules, infusions and filters. Br Med J. 1986;292:714-715.
Kempen PM, Sulkowski E, Sawyer RA. Glass ampules and associated hazards. Crit Care Med. 1989;17(8):812-813.
Sabon RL, Cheng EY, Stommel KA, Hennen CR. Glass particle contamination: influence of aspiration methods and ampule types. Anesthesiology. 1989;70(5):59-62.
Falchuk KH, Peterson L, McNeil BJ. Microparticulate-induced phlebitis: its prevention by in-line filtration. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:78-82.
Fred L. Meister is a clinical pharmacologist at Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, Calif, and an assistant clinical professor at the University of California, San Francisco.
ampules are not commonly used nowadays but if you come across one you need to be prepared in how to safely open and withdraw from one. its been since nursing school that all of a sudden we started carrying ampules, I was surprised but always remembered the technique and using a filter needle.
The ASHP 2008 guidelines involve the above USP 797 standard and the use of a 5-µm filter needle or straw when drawing medication from a glass ampule. The INS (2011) Standard 28.6 states: “a blunted filter needle or filter straw shall be used when drawing medication from glass ampules”
AUGUST 98 - VOLUME 18 - NUMBER 4
FILTER NEEDLES AND GLASS AMPULES
Q. Are special filter needles required when drawing up medication from a glass ampule? Are there hidden risks to patients, ie, sharp glass particles, if a filter needle is not used?
A. Fred L Meister, PharmD, replies:
Bacterial contamination has always been the major concern associated with the intravenous administration of medications and is a well-known cause of morbidity and mortality. Additional risk factors, however, have been identified and must also be considered.
The potential risks associated with administration of medications supplied in glass ampules is much greater than realized by most practitioners. Opening a glass ampule produces a shower of glass particles, many of which enter the ampule and contaminate the contents. Some of the particles have been shown to carry bacteria, though the significance of this has not been determined.
The number of glass particles found in opened ampules varies, but most reports indicate approximately 100 particles, ranging in size from 10 to 1,000 �m, per 10-mL ampule. The particle count increases as the size of the ampule increases (ie, a 20-mL ampule will contain more glass particles than a 10-mL ampule). When the content of a 10-mL ampule is aspirated through an 18-gauge, 1.5-inch needle, the particle count is reduced by approximately one third (ie, approximately 65 particles remain in the aspirate), and the maximum particle size is reduced to less than 400 �m.
The potential risks associated with intravenous administration of glass particles are based on animal studies, though similar risks would apply equally to humans. It has been shown that glass particles cause inflammatory reactions (eg, phlebitis) and granuloma formation in pulmonary, hepatic, splenic, renal, and intestinal tissue. This represents a significant risk of an adverse patient outcome.
The effective removal of glass particles from an opened ampule can be accomplished by aspirating through a 19-gauge, 5-�m filter needle. Using this method decreases the average total number of particles in the aspirate to approximately �1, and the particle size to less than 200 �m. Using a 0.22-�m in-line filter offers little or no additional benefit, and is more costly and labor intensive--once the ampule content is aspirated into a syringe, the filter needle must be replaced with a standard needle prior to transferring or administering the medication.
Based on the available information, a filter needle is recommended when aspirating a medication from a glass ampule.
References
Turco S, Davis NM. Glass particles in intravenous injections. N Engl J Med. 1972;287:1204-1205.
Carbone-Traber KB, Shanks CA. Glass particle contamination in single-dose ampules. Anesth Analg. 1986;65:1361-1363.
Waller DG, George CF. Ampules, infusions and filters. Br Med J. 1986;292:714-715.
Kempen PM, Sulkowski E, Sawyer RA. Glass ampules and associated hazards. Crit Care Med. 1989;17(8):812-813.
Sabon RL, Cheng EY, Stommel KA, Hennen CR. Glass particle contamination: influence of aspiration methods and ampule types. Anesthesiology. 1989;70(5):59-62.
Falchuk KH, Peterson L, McNeil BJ. Microparticulate-induced phlebitis: its prevention by in-line filtration. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:78-82.
Fred L. Meister is a clinical pharmacologist at Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach, Calif, and an assistant clinical professor at the University of California, San Francisco.
7 سال پیش
در تاریخ 1396/08/13 منتشر شده
است.
12,548
بـار بازدید شده