Response to "The Global Warming Hoax Lord Monckton & Stefan Molyneux"
244.1 هزار بار بازدید -
8 سال پیش
-
SOURCES:0:05
SOURCES:
0:05 -- Video
1:34 – 1990 First Assessment Report, IPCC
1:41 – Ibid.
1:51 – “Assessment of the first consensus prediction on climate change,”
Frame and Stone, Nature Climate Change 2012
2:43 – Ibid.
3:21 – “Global warming is a hoax” by Christopher Monckton -- Lord Christopher Monckton | Global Wa...
I received this error notice from a subscriber re the Monckton RSS graph:
ERROR. I think you might have made a mistake when refuting Monckton's claim about there being no warming according to the RSS data. If you look at the graph Monckton showed at 3:23 it says "TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt". TLT stands for lower tropospheric temperature. I looked at the paper you cited to refute Monckton and I think it only makes temperature measurement corrections for the TMT (midtropospheric temperature) and not for the TLT. Monckton's claim that there was no global warming for the periods he talked about is still wrong anyway because it relies on multiple layers of cherry picking. He is only looking at one part of the climate system and he cherry picks his start and end points. He chose to start his graph close to 1998 when there was a large spike in TLT due to the strong El Nino. If you look at the data on the RSS website it shows that TLT in 2016 rose above 1998 levels and if you look at the entire RSS record of TLT from 1979 to April 2017 you get an upward trend of 0.135 K/decade.
Sources:
Sensitivity of Satellite-Derived Tropospheric Temperature Trends
to the Diurnal Cycle Adjustment” – Mears and Wentz, Journal of Climate 2016
http://www.remss.com/measurements/upp...
http://data.remss.com/msu/monthly_tim...
03:38 – GISS -- http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/gra...
03:42 – NOAA -- https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-se...
03:46 – Japan Meterorological Agency -- http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/prod...
03:51 -- www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/monitoring/climate/surface-temperature
04:09 -- http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/07/o...
04:16 -- Sensitivity of Satellite-Derived Tropospheric Temperature Trends
to the Diurnal Cycle Adjustment” – Mears and Wentz, Journal of Climate 2016
05:19 -- http://english.cas.cn/publications/
05:26 – http://link.springer.com/article/10.1...
05:34 -- Downloaded from: http://www.springer.com/popular/journ...
06:15 – From my video “Monckton Bunkum – sensitivity.” All sources are in the video description.
07:42 – “Apocalypse? No!” by Christopher Monckton
07:58 -- Video
Nature Geoscience 1, 735 - 743 (2008)
Published online: 26 October 2008 | doi:10.1038/ngeo337
10:01 – “The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes” – Knutti and Hegerl,, Nature Geoscience 2008
12:53 -- A typical ocean albedo is approximately 0.06, while bare sea ice varies from approximately 0.5 to 0.7. This means that the ocean reflects only 6 percent of the incoming solar radiation and absorbs the rest, while sea ice reflects 50 to 70 percent of the incoming energy. The sea ice absorbs less solar energy and keeps the surface cooler.
Snow has an even higher albedo than sea ice, and so thick sea ice covered with snow reflects as much as 90 percent of the incoming solar radiation." -- National Snow and Ice Data Center (https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/seaice/p...)
14:19 -- http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/~brianpm/down...
14:22 -- Title and author shown in video
15:21 -- https://www.princeton.edu/physics/peo...
15:50 -- Title and author shown in video
15:57 -- Title and author shown in video
16:02 -- Title and author shown in video
16:23 -- Title and author shown in video
17:11 – “Climate Sensitivity during the Phanerozoic: Lessons for the Future” -- Dana L. Royer http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdf...
0:05 -- Video
1:34 – 1990 First Assessment Report, IPCC
1:41 – Ibid.
1:51 – “Assessment of the first consensus prediction on climate change,”
Frame and Stone, Nature Climate Change 2012
2:43 – Ibid.
3:21 – “Global warming is a hoax” by Christopher Monckton -- Lord Christopher Monckton | Global Wa...
I received this error notice from a subscriber re the Monckton RSS graph:
ERROR. I think you might have made a mistake when refuting Monckton's claim about there being no warming according to the RSS data. If you look at the graph Monckton showed at 3:23 it says "TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt". TLT stands for lower tropospheric temperature. I looked at the paper you cited to refute Monckton and I think it only makes temperature measurement corrections for the TMT (midtropospheric temperature) and not for the TLT. Monckton's claim that there was no global warming for the periods he talked about is still wrong anyway because it relies on multiple layers of cherry picking. He is only looking at one part of the climate system and he cherry picks his start and end points. He chose to start his graph close to 1998 when there was a large spike in TLT due to the strong El Nino. If you look at the data on the RSS website it shows that TLT in 2016 rose above 1998 levels and if you look at the entire RSS record of TLT from 1979 to April 2017 you get an upward trend of 0.135 K/decade.
Sources:
Sensitivity of Satellite-Derived Tropospheric Temperature Trends
to the Diurnal Cycle Adjustment” – Mears and Wentz, Journal of Climate 2016
http://www.remss.com/measurements/upp...
http://data.remss.com/msu/monthly_tim...
03:38 – GISS -- http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/gra...
03:42 – NOAA -- https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-se...
03:46 – Japan Meterorological Agency -- http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/prod...
03:51 -- www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/monitoring/climate/surface-temperature
04:09 -- http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/07/o...
04:16 -- Sensitivity of Satellite-Derived Tropospheric Temperature Trends
to the Diurnal Cycle Adjustment” – Mears and Wentz, Journal of Climate 2016
05:19 -- http://english.cas.cn/publications/
05:26 – http://link.springer.com/article/10.1...
05:34 -- Downloaded from: http://www.springer.com/popular/journ...
06:15 – From my video “Monckton Bunkum – sensitivity.” All sources are in the video description.
07:42 – “Apocalypse? No!” by Christopher Monckton
07:58 -- Video
Nature Geoscience 1, 735 - 743 (2008)
Published online: 26 October 2008 | doi:10.1038/ngeo337
10:01 – “The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes” – Knutti and Hegerl,, Nature Geoscience 2008
12:53 -- A typical ocean albedo is approximately 0.06, while bare sea ice varies from approximately 0.5 to 0.7. This means that the ocean reflects only 6 percent of the incoming solar radiation and absorbs the rest, while sea ice reflects 50 to 70 percent of the incoming energy. The sea ice absorbs less solar energy and keeps the surface cooler.
Snow has an even higher albedo than sea ice, and so thick sea ice covered with snow reflects as much as 90 percent of the incoming solar radiation." -- National Snow and Ice Data Center (https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/seaice/p...)
14:19 -- http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/~brianpm/down...
14:22 -- Title and author shown in video
15:21 -- https://www.princeton.edu/physics/peo...
15:50 -- Title and author shown in video
15:57 -- Title and author shown in video
16:02 -- Title and author shown in video
16:23 -- Title and author shown in video
17:11 – “Climate Sensitivity during the Phanerozoic: Lessons for the Future” -- Dana L. Royer http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdf...
8 سال پیش
در تاریخ 1395/10/07 منتشر شده
است.
244,137
بـار بازدید شده