Judge Aileen Cannon sets NO trial date - thus far - in Trump's documents/obstruction/espionage case

Trump-appionted Judge Aileen Cannon heard arguments from the prosecutors and from Trump's attorneys about when Trump's case should go to trial. Special Counsel Jack Smith's team has consistently asked for the trial to be set for December 2023. Trump wants the trial to be set AFTER the November 2024 presidential election.

Judge Cannon set . . . no trial date, but indicated she would issue an order "promptly." What are the implications of this inaction by Cannon and where is she likely to land on the issue of an appropriate trial date?

This video also explores Donald Trump's new favorite mantra - that prosecuting him for his crimes constitutes "election interference." Yet, in that Florida courtroom, it was Trump's lawyers who tried to tie the trail date to the date of a presidential election. Which actually felt a bit like . . . election interference, in the sense that, if Trump's trial was conducted prior to the next presidential election, the American voters would know whether they were voting for a convicted felon or someone who was fully exonerated at trial.

For our Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise shop, please visit:

https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...

Please consider becoming a #TeamJustice patron at:  Patreon: glennkirschner

And you can find my audio podcast, Justice Matters, wherever you usually get your podcasts.

And my website at glennkirschner.com

Follow me on:
Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2
Twitter:  Twitter: glennkirschner2
Facebook: Facebook: glennkirschner2
Instagram: Instagram: glennkirschner2