Why Are Jesus’ Genealogies in Matthew and Luke Different?

The birth narratives in both Matthew and Luke help answer the question, “Who is Jesus and where did he come from?” One of the ways each book does this is by recounting Jesus’ genealogy. The problem is: the genealogies are different. The Old Testament predicted that the Messiah would come from the line of David. Both Matthew and Luke provide genealogies of Jesus that confirm he was a descendant of David—therefore, a legitimate Messiah. He was a legitimate claimant to the throne of Israel. But they differ in an important way: Matthew follows the line of David’s son Solomon, while Luke follows the line of Nathan, another Son of David. The end result is two distinct genealogies. How do we account for this? Some argue that either Matthew or Luke got it wrong. They created or borrowed a genealogy in order to provide Jesus with a legitimate ancestry. Or they accuse later Christians for artificially creating a genealogy to provide Jesus with a Davidic lineage after the fact. Yet there are three other possible explanations for the two different genealogies. *** Learn more in Mark Strauss's online course: courses.zondervanacademic.com/four-portraits-one-j…

• #education
• #jesus_genealogy
• #genealogy_of_jesus
• #jesus_birth
• #infancy_narrative
• #luke
• #matthew
• #mark_strauss
• #christmas